Hospital monitoring platforms: 6 essential features for smarter decision

Introduction 

In today’s healthcare environment, the need for reliable, scalable, and affordable patient monitoring has never been greater. Urbanization, rising chronic disease burdens, clinicians’ shortages, and legacy infrastructure all converge to create intense pressure on hospitals in regions around the globe particularly in middle income countries^1,2. 

Yet, with the right tools, healthcare systems can overcome traditional monitoring barriers, and improve both patient safety and clinician efficiency, while supporting long-term sustainability. One of the critical tools to break these barriers is the patient monitoring platform: a flexible, hospital-wide solution designed to scale, adapt, and perform in real-world conditions where complexity, urgency, and volume are daily realities³ . 

That’s why in this guide, we’ll delve into which considerations are important for healthcare providers to account for when selecting a monitoring platform. Keeping these considerations in mind will allow you to put the experience of global leaders in clinical excellence to work for you to make the right investment for both your patients and your institution’s future.

Focusing on the needs 

While middle income hospitals share many of the needs of those that are more established, such as rising levels of chronic diseases, including heart disease, diabetes, and obesity, these issues are layered in addition to other issues like: 

• existing infectious disease burdens: this includes outbreaks of emerging, re-emerging and endemic pathogens¹
• resource constraints: outdated infrastructure, unreliable electricity, and limited access to advanced equipment are challenges faced by many healthcare systems⁴ .
• staff shortages: Rotating staff, undertrained clinicians, and burnout are common^2,5.
• fragmented technology: different vendors and incompatible systems break the care continuum³ .
• regulatory gaps: inconsistent standards of care allow subpar equipment to enter the market, adding risks for the hospital processes and lowering the level of care⁵ . 

Because of these needs, healthcare leaders need to think about few very important questions when considering any monitoring platform: 

• will this system reduce staff workload – or add to it?
• can it work across different care areas with minimal training?
• can it help simplify work and improve the decision process?
• will the alarms be accurate or a distraction? 

Not every vital sign monitor is made the same 

Numerous vital sign monitors with plenty of features and capabilities are available in the market. Patient monitoring involves the continuous or periodic observation and measurement of a patient’s physiological functions and vital signs. This includes tracking heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, temperature, and oxygen saturation levels. 

The goal is to quickly detect any deviations from normal ranges that might indicate a deterioration in the patient’s condition to be able to act accordingly. 

If the fundamentals of patient monitoring technology are solid, the monitoring signal output will be accurate and trustworthy for the clinical decision process. Consequently, the work of the care givers will be improved and simplified, for example with much less false alarms or sensors repositioning. 

What are the key pillars that build the fundamentals of a trustworthy monitoring solution?

Signal acquisition: refers to the process of capturing and converting patient vital signals into a format that can be processed and analyzed by algorithms. Not only the quality and design of the sensors attached to the patient make a difference in the signal acquisition (is the sensor too loose? not correctly adhering to the surface?, affected by motion artifact?) but also noise suppressor filters, signal amplification, number of input channels, speed of sample and more may impact the performance of one monitor compared to another. 

The monitors should be operating with validated sensors, tailored to meet the demands of the application, providing accurate readings and satisfying performance expectations.

Signal processing: focuses on analysing, modifying and synthesizing acquired signals to optimize transmissions, correcting distorted signals, making accurate clinical interpretation possible. Accurate algorithms are at core of this. 

How advanced the algorithms are, dictate the overall quality of the information displayed on the monitor. Particularly sensitivity and specificity play a key role respectively to detect many true events as possible and to discard false events.

Accurate algorithms may perform to

• improve the ability to distinguish artifacts from true vital signs.
• allow continuous monitoring even in the presence of an artifact therefore reducing interruption of care.
• have high sensitivity particularly at thresholds for the diagnosis of hypotension and hypertension.
• have high accuracy in measuring under low and very low perfusion thresholds.
• reduce the latency between signal acquisition and the readable information on the monitor. Even a delay of few seconds between a surgeon’s actions and the visual feedback on the monitor could compromise the patient outcome

Monitors and algorithms should also be robustly tested by the company and certified by an independent laboratory.

Configurability: when a patient monitor is flexible in terms of hardware and software adjustments (i.e. ‘on the spot’ addition of new parameters, trending and display configuration capability, advanced alarm management and visual support tools) then more efficient protocols are reinforced and actionable clinical notifications generated

Core capabilities of a future-ready monitoring platform

To assess a monitoring platform in terms of patient safety, clinician efficiency and long-term sustainability, areas to consider include: 

1. Ease of use: designed for fast learning and flexibility

In busy and complex clinical environments, a solution that takes over part of the burden would simplify life6 . For example a monitoring solution that includes 

• large, readable displays with high-contrast visuals
• self-explanatory user interface that reduces need for formal training
• standardized workflows for patient admission, discharge, and escalation
• customizable settings by care area (ICU, ED, OR, step-down units)
• visualization tools that gather and combine clinical inputs from different sources (different parameters) and make complex information easy to handle for a proficient decision process

What do I need to make sure I think about?

•  can staff with limited training operate the patient monitor under pressure or during a crisis?
• how many clicks does it take to perform a function?
• does the user interface adapt to different clinical environments and allows operators to intuitively find the required information or settings?
• can redundancy in the user interface help caregivers to find the information coming from different navigation points?

2. Clinical excellence: trustworthy, validated, smart

Patient monitoring solutions should give healthcare professionals accurate actionable data they need to anticipate, identify, and treat patient acuity across the continuum of care.

• From skin to screen: sensors engineered to reduce false alarms and ensure signal integrity so that what is read on the screen reflects what happens in the body
• Validated and extensively tested algorithms that process vital signs data for clinically actionable outputs (e.g. smart alarm management, arrhythmia detection, blood pressure accuracy)^7,8
• Real-time access to patient data across care areas
• Alarm optimization that supports a “quiet” environment⁹
• Advanced visualization tools that support fast and efficient clinical decision making

What do I need to make sure I think about? 

• are the algorithms and sensors clinically validated and proven to perform in high-pressure settings?
• how does the system prevent alarm fatigue and support rapid decision-making?

3. Scalability: one platform, many care areas

Clinical workflows differ in diverse care areas. Accordingly, the solution should be customized to the specific care area we are operating in, as well as the flexibility of using specific parameters when needed³ . 

• modular design with true plug-and-play components expandable on the fly (not limited to the monitoring configuration chosen at the purchase act)
• ability to scale up from basic vitals to more specialized parameters
• transport monitors that dock and integrate seamlessly with central systems (like Electronic Medical Report if available)
• consistent user experience across all units, hospital wide – reducing training time

What do I need to make sure I think about? 

• can I deploy the same system across the entire hospital?
• will it grow with my hospital’s clinical needs over the next decades?

4. Mobility & intra hospital transport: continuity without compromise

When moving a patient between care areas, surveillance and intervention should be equal to those observed in the service of origin to maintaining a remarkable level of patient safety³ . 

• transport monitors with long battery life and robust casing
• seamless handoff of patient data from one area to the next
• battery power for environments with power fluctuations^1,4

What do I need to make sure I think about?

•  does the monitor lose data during patient transport?
• can the device withstand transport bumps, drops, and electrical instability?
• does the monitor allow to measure all the critical parameters for the patient’s level of acuity (intubated patients, patients with unstable hemodynamics)

5. Affordability: designed for long-term value

How can a wide purchase monitoring solution be in line with t he long-term financial stability goals of the hospital? Many aspects should be considered, not only the one-time acquisition. A newly purchased monitoring solution should have: 

• an entry-level option with future upgrade potential
• an enterprise-wide compatibility to reduce the need for installation of multiple systems
• a digital workflow that reduces paper usage and error rates⁴
• limited ongoing maintenance and low training overhead

What do I need to make sure I think about? 

• can we upgrade the installed fleet, or must we replace the entire solution?
• what’s the total cost of ownership over 5–7 years, including training and service and consumable supply?

6. Reliability you can trust

Relying on a partner’s competence, extensive experience in healthcare monitoring and commitment to shared similar goals is the foundation for a long-term collaboration. 

• proven experience in both advanced and general healthcare institutions ^3,5
• strong footprint for after sales support as well as service continuity
• legacy of clinical innovation in patient monitoring
• not hidden maintenance costs and long-term parts availability

What do I need to make sure I think about? 

• does this vendor have a track record of long-term partnerships in markets like mine?
• is this vendor recognized as an innovative and clinically excellent company?
• will this partner still be there for the lifetime of my monitoring platform?

Final thoughts: transforming challenges into opportunities

Most healthcare institutions around the world aren’t just resourceconstrained, they have a potential to twist into an innovation-rich hub. Hospitals that choose wisely today can position themselves for future growth, smarter workflows, and better patient outcomes tomorrow. The right monitoring platform doesn’t just measure vitals – it protects patients, lightens clinician burden, and future-proofs hospital investment.

Quick Summary: what to look for in a monitoring solution 

• Ease of use: few training, intuitive operations, standardized workflows
• Clinical accuracy: validated algorithms, signal quality, smart alarms
• Scalability: modular design, multi-acuity support, add on parameters
• Transport readiness: durable, battery-powered, seamless handoffs
• Affordability: low total cost of ownership, upgradeable platform, reduced maintenance
• Trusted partner with global experience, regional support

References 

1. Revolutionizing Healthcare in Emerging Markets: Overcoming Challenges and Seizing Opportunities – FMR Global Health.
2. Healthcare Challenges 2025: Key Issues & Future Insights.
3. The Emerging Market in Health Care Innovation. McKinsey & Company.
4. Geneva Association. The Health Protection Gap.
5. Major Healthcare Challenges and Their Solutions.
6. Disrupting Healthcare: 4 Lessons from Emerging Markets. Pharmaphorum.
7. GE Healthcare. Maximizing Arrhythmia Detection with EK-Pro Algorithm.
8. GE Healthcare. DINAMAP SuperSTAT Algorithm: Setting Target Inflation Pressure.
9. GE Healthcare. Combating Alarm Fatigue: An Interview with Faye Aebly

Not all products or features are available in all countries. 

Reproduction in any form is forbidden without prior written permission from GE HealthCare. 

Nothing in this material should be used to diagnose or treat any disease or condition. Readers must consult a healthcare professional. 

Data subject to change.

 © 2025 GE HealthCare GE is a trademark of General Electric Company used under trademark license. 

Reproduction in any form is forbidden without prior written permission from GE HealthCare. 

JB34081XX 9/2025